The devestating effects of logging in the rainforest Research Paper

The devestating effects of logging in the rainforest - Research Paper ExampleFurther much, according to the statistics, more than 80 percent of the humankinds ancient forests (Tscharntke, 2007) have been destroyed due to the logging. This paper is a brief attempt to explore heterogeneous dimensions devastating effects of logging in rainforests on various stakeholders. Discussion Rainforests once covered more than 14 percent (Bermingham, Dick & Moritz, 2005) of the total land on this planet however, today every second, the institution is losing one and half acre of rainforests (Bermingham, Dick & Moritz, 2005) and thus, it is left with less than 6 percent of rainforests. Research indicates that if this process continues then we are likely to run out of rainforests in the glide slope three decades (Tscharntke, 2007). Currently, almost a quarter of the western dugs are derived from rainforest ingredients. Furthermore, interesting is the fact that scientists retrieve that they have only checked less than a percent of the total species of rainforests, which means that with deforestation of rainforests, the world is losing the cure of many diseases (Bermingham, Dick & Moritz, 2005). Logging is most common in the developing and underdeveloped countries of the world where in that respect are large reserves of rainforest. Quite understandably, considering the income levels of these countries, money becomes an urgent, unavoidable, and imperative need. On an average, a hectare of trees in rainforest can earn the loggers more than 40000 US dollars, which is nearly equal to a fortune for them. To sort out matters worst, most of the governments in these countries are also involved in these practices since they have no other(a) steering to earn foreign exchange. However, these governments fail to realize that the logs that they sell to countries like America and other European countries, they later spend more than half of the foreign exchange or export earnings to b uy historic wood products as pulp, paper and others from these very countries (Laurance & Peres, 2006). It is important to none that timber industry claims to be avocation safe logging practices, which include selective logging and full forest harvesting. Interestingly, both of them are not at all safe. Selective logging whitethorn refer to the process of choosing specific mature trees to harvest. in one case the harvesting process is complete, a sapling is planted so that a new tree can grow. However, this never results in favorable results. In most rainforests, average size of trees is very high which blocks sunlight and nutrients for other small trees (Jepma, 1995). Furthermore, research indicates that removing one tree from a bunch of trees in a rainforest may result in the death of 17 more trees. This is true because trees develop a system of interdependence with each other especially in rainforests (Tscharntke et al., 2009). Full forest harvesting which refers to the proce ss of harvesting the wide trees with its branches and leaves is an even dangerous method of logging. The nutrients taken from the malicious gossip are usually in the leaves and branches of the trees and taking them extraneous leaves the forest with lesser chances to grow again. Furthermore, with direct exposure of sunlight in the gaps and empty spaces dries the soil and the soil loses precious nitrogen (Tscharntke, 2007). In the absence of rainforest trees, the balance of carbon dioxide is being disturbed since there