Hamlet Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 2

crossroads - Essay ExampleWith this go steadying in mind, the express focus of this brief analysis will be with regards to comparing William Shakespe bes small town with Tom Stoppards Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. Rather than merely approach shot to the delineation that these two plays are from different eras and represent a specific and unique take upon the realities that define life, it is the hope of this author that the forthcoming analysis will be beneficial in helping the indorser to understand specific dynamics of these plays, specific approaches of the authors, and a specific level of understanding with regards to the comparison and phone line that will be delineated. The very first element of comparison and logical argument that should be made among these two plays is with regards to the differential in approach of norms and more thans that define society, religious belief, and/or reality itself. For instance, Shakespeares Hamlet presents the reader with so mething of a unanimous and ordered society, uniform in its slot, religious beliefs, ideology, and business transactions (Javed 329). The pecking order that is represented within the play is of course denoted with regards to the objet dartner in which Hamlet acts as the ultimate freewoman able to define his own fate and that of his countrymen upon a whim. Moreover, religious belief is something that is uniform throughout Shakespeares play with Hamlet and others oftentimes representing and unshaken belief that an afterlife and the purpose of the current life advise be defined through a very strict Judeo-Christian norm. By means of comparison, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is much more asymmetrical its approach. ... By means of comparison, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is much more asymmetrical its approach. As such, a lack of religious faith, a destruction in the belief or understanding that social norms are acceptable and efficient in their application, and the int egration of the fact that a gigantic level of irrational and ideological thought impacts the way in which decisions are made and humans move with one another is evidenced at nearly every juncture (Lewis 611). By means of contrast of the simplistic understanding of religion and social order exhibited in Hamlet, the social order and religious trust that are exhibited in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is far different. Ultimately, an erosion of conviction, a lack of faith, a masses of society, and the belief that diversity rather than uniformity is the greatest means of empowerment. With regards to style and form, it can also be noted that Hamlet is a classical drama referencing a discernible shape, beginning, midpoint, and in. As such, as a result of the fact that the preceding elements of the plot demand a level of conclusion, the reader is left to understand that action is required within the conclusion as a means of rectifying this tension. However, by means of compariso n, the unreason and the loss of sense of control that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead exhibits and denotes an underlying lack of confidence with regards to the way in which the plot will be resolved. Further, a unique level of differential also exists with regards to the representation of man in both place (Nejad 59). Whereas men are represented within