Motivation in History: Charles Beard and the Founding Fathers Essay

Through bulge history in that respect are every(prenominal) kinds of historians that describe about our history and how we got to where we are. Charles Beard is a unique historian because he talks about the motives on our history event by non just any event. This issue created a lot of tilt on what Charles Beard believed and that is the motives of the Founding Fathers.Charles Beard published An Economic rendering of the Constitution of the United States on whether the Constitutions defenders simply touch for the soil or were they interested in protecting their own solid interest. He also describes that questioning the motives of the Constitutions confineers, it also demonstrate how important our interpretations of the past could be.The supporters of the Constitution before made the Articles of bond. The Article of Confederation was de signalinged for the States to have the power and to have a weak fundamental government, just now it produced some problems. Money capita l suffered under the Articles of Confederation, the lack of securities for American products and investments into the foreign market. excessively under the Article of Confederation the government was non paying the interest on its debt from the war, which crippled the coun smack. He made these arguments to back his thesis on that the supporters of the Constitution was looking for their interest and not tout ensemble the nations interest.After Charles Beard published this thesis, made a dispute against different(a) historians.These historians do not believe Charles Beards thesis and try to disprove his thoughts and prove that the supports did not write the Constitution for their own interest. In a chart, which shows the Delegates that were at the Constitution Convention. The Delegates on this chart are mountain having public security holdings, who are bulk from all different backgrounds. The Delegates in general signed the Constitution were not all wealthy landowners looking out for them. There was some small farmer in that group, who would never sign the document to advantage the rich. In other chart on the Delegates to the impudently York State Ratifying Convention shows that there was a mixes ofpeople with different stinting status voting for the Ratifying Convention. Also the people who voted were Federal and Anti-Federal that voted Federal, plus lawyers did not vote for it and those would be the kind of people to want the Constitution if it was to benefit the supporters. This chart showing that it was not just the supports interest it was made for the nation because they were different people voting different ways.The Founding Fathers Debate the government activity of Congress discusses about the thought of the Delegates, who were at the Convention. Mr. Gerry was one of those men there and he verbalize The evil we experience flow from the excess of democracy. Also It would seem to be maxim of democracy to starve the public servants. To what Mr . Gerry said and that he left without signing the Constitution and who also had the largest amount of money. exclusively these disprove what Beard was trying to prove in his thesis because if it benefited the supporters wont he be one to want to sign it. bottom Madison said From the protection of differing and unequal abilities for the acquiring of property, there results the stubbornness of different degrees and kinds of property and from the influence of these differences there follows a division of baseball club into different interests and parties. With different interests there cannot be a majority make the Constitution for their own interest. Alexander Hamilton discuses about the needs the government must attend to and under the Article of Confederation would never be possible. He pushes the Constitution that can handle all of its problems and looked for the best interest of the people because it does benefit him just the stability of the country.I believe that Beards the sis on the motives of the Founding Fathers was not entirely correct because it was to a greater extent than economics. I am impress on his thesis because he does creates support back up his thesis and with just reading his writing it makes you admiration is it possible, which is want he want that to be the reaction of people. The problem is if you are an historian you could not just read his writing, you must research other source and reading other primary sources the Beards thesis died out.Beard thesis is a step to understand our past with this the historians shake others to research better and so on. That was one of Beards goalsbut it backfired and took his thesis out of believing it was possible. This is a way of life and that it is the chasten of the Constitution to have been able to disprove peoples work and improve to understand our past.