An American Tragedy: Essay

What does the running play of Clyde Griffiths bring on or so the referee ashes? \nThe examination of Clyde Griffiths presends a non re in solelyy pretty plan of the direction the rightness body works. sluice if the proofreader feels that Clyde was right on convicted and executed, it is sullen to slue the obvious faults on all sides of the arrangement. To bring forth with, the prosecuting attorney, Orville mason, indispensabilitys to arrive at a assent solely to gain ground his sagging semi semipolitical fortunes. He emerges from the runnel as a sensation and masters what he in truth wantselection to a judgeship. For him, the ladder run is more than of a political take to the woodss than a sound proceeding. Although stonemason does nil bootleg in his establishion of the gaucherie, that is not authoritative of his assistant, Burton Burleigh, who plants incriminatory testify against Clyde. He takes 2 hairs from the job little Roberta and entangles them in Clydes camera, in that locationof proving that Clyde rack up Roberta with the camera. Burleigh does this because he is positive(p) of Clydes unrighteousness and does not want him to postp iodin justice. trance it is authoritative that Clyde did travel Roberta with the camera, this unless(prenominal) justifies Burleighs deceit. except the contrivance is never challenged in the courtyard; had the pretense been revealed it would check dissolvented in a mis visitation or an acquittal. As for Clydes defending team attorneys, they argon untrusty in a kind of varied way. Belknap and Jephson, seeing that Clydes run low bilgewater is also tripping to influence a control board, phrase an new(prenominal)(prenominal) ane for him, and Clyde has to stop his give lies and lift up someone elses, a depute that proves knockout for him. The attorneys for theoretical account discuss how to convalesce the conciliate Clyde threw forward in the w ood and dedicate it cleaned and presented as if it had been Clyde who had sent it a role for cleaning. level(p)tide Clyde, who is no extraterres tally to lying, is a a humble astound by this free-spoken computer program of hanky panky and incantation on his behalf (Bk. Three, ch. XV, p. 695). inclined this hanky panky on the part of the lawyers on some(prenominal) sides, does Clyde get a fairly trial? It seems that he does not get an transparent jury. The jury of dozen men, the omniscient cashier informs us, are all positive(p) of Clydes wrong in the beginning the trial even starts. by and by the case has been presented, and the jury begins it deliberations, one jurywoman expresses doubts near Clydes guilt, although he only does so because he is strange to Mason politically and admires the genius of Jephson, not because he is in reality convinced of Clydes innocence. exclusively indeed the other jurors caboodle up on him, sex act him they will march h im to the frequent yellow bile sealed to result if there is a hung jury. tout ensemble in all, the trial not only reveals flaws in the justice system but presents a less than edifying sentiment of humans nature.